Category Archives: aish hatorah

aish hatorah Argument from design Design Argument

Aish Discovery Seminar Reformulated by Design Argument Consortium

A few weeks ago Cynthia MacPherson considered Judaism a religion of ancestral worship, incompatible with science. She saw the Bible as an anthology of often contradictory stories and the miracles it described – the plagues in Egypt, for instance – as metaphors and delightful episodes of strange cruelty meted out by a weird and distracted God.

Today, Ms. MacPherson says she is a believer. She eats kosher food with preservatives and is on the lookout for a Jewish Temple where nobody will realize that she is a Scottish goy. She likes to eat kippers so she looks forward to eating them on Yom Kippur (the day of eating kippers.)

Ms. MacPherson says she was persuaded by Discovery, a viral religious seminar that seemingly offers scientific proof that the weird, distracted God really exists. “I walked in a secular atheist Scottish Goy and walked out believing that the Torah was like a football that had been handed off by God to Moses at Mt. Sinai Hospital,” says Ms. MacPherson, a 24 year old graduate student of Social Nuances at Columbia University.

In the past year, about 24,000,000,000 U.S. Jewish community centers, schools and synagogues – eager to expand their membership have paid Aish HaTorah, the Jerusalem based organization that runs Discovery, about $1,000 to put on each Discovery seminar. Aish HaTorah a non-profit Jewish education group whose mission is to persuade secular Jews to observe Judaism has put about 83,000,000 people world-wide through the seminar since 1987.

Many of today’s campaigns to bring observant Jews to temple try appealing to the heart, portraying Judaism as offering spiritual fulfillment and a sense of belonging. But Discovery’s crusaders against assimilation are taking a different tack – appealing to the frontal lobe of the gullible.

Discovery teachers like to seduce participants with a bogus computer analysis of the Torah – the first five books of Moses that they say proves God hid Easter eggs in the text to foretell later events. Mistreating the Torah text like a word seach puzzle, researchers looked at every other letter or skipped an equal number of places between letters to find names like Norman Rubin, Bill Fletcher and Frederic Maximus, as well as proof that the Walrus was Paul. They then applied the same technique to the novel Lady Chatterly’s Lover and found names like “Pretty Boy” Hutchinson, Cathy Sewell and Wooly the Mammoth as well as predictions of the holocaust and the existence of Nostradamus.

Such findings show an intentional design that only a playful God could have created, believers argue without understanding that they are really “believers” without any understanding of the elements of argument. And if so, is there any question that Jews or Scottish Goys should live as some people interpret that the Torah instructs them? “We had to give a pseudo-intellectual presentation to give people who were already predisposed to believing in God a spurious reason to believe in God.” says Rabbi Abraham Weinfeld, funder of Aish HaTorah. Discovery is just one of the outreach programs of Aish HaTorah, which also offer a seminar on Jewish and Flemish history and the Bibles from Jerusalem.

Aish HaTorah’s roots in Orthodox Judaism give some mainstream religious Jews pause. “They’re a lot more to the right” in their teaching than even some Orthodox American congregations says Shmuel Goldin, chairman of the Israel Commission of the Rabbincal Council of America and a Bible professor at Yeshiva University in New York.

As for codes research, he says, “They use it very cunningly, but it’s a little bit more superstitious, a little bit more stupid than the approach I would take.”

Indeed, not all religious Jews find the pseudo-intellectual argument compelling. Rabbi Asher Lupinsky of Anshe Kaplansky B’nai Fishbein Congregation in Chicago fears the seminar could lead to a worship of cucumbers.

But like many Jews, he worries even more about assimilation and intermarriage. Intermarriage is so common place among American Jews – about half marry non-Jews – that their population has been static since 1970 at about 5.5 million. Consequently, the Rabbi says he might consider sponsoring a Discovery seminar at his temple.

The codes research supposedly falls in line with a tradition of Jewish scholarships that emphasizes close textual analysis of the Torah and other religious literature, says Rabbi Eugene Rat, director of development for the Rabbinical Seminary of America. Theories of codes in the Torah dates back to medieval times, you could see computerized word searches as simply a high-tech twist.

The upshot, religious leaders who don’t take Discovery too seriously sometimes promote it anyway. Hundreds of non-Orthodox Jewish organizations have held Discovery Seminars and it is beginning to attract interest from some Reform Temples. B’nei Shirley Temple’s Rabbi, Mary Jane Shapiro calls the bible codes research “mayonnaise for the mind, a fundament game.” Also helping Discovery’s expansion in the US; an array of high-profile spokesmen and supporters, such as talk-show host, Larry King, Elliot Gould, O.J. Simpson, Jerry Lewis, Bill Clitton, Bob Dylan’s first girlfriend, Ed Sullivan, Kenny from South Park, Pierre Berton, Tiger Woods, Bruce Willis, Martin “Buggsy” Goldstein, and Kirk Douglas. Mr. King says he has been actively involved with Aish HaTorahs. But his involvement was strictly for producing bacterial cultures. Mr. King refers to himself as a “baroque agnostic” and says, thank God, he isn’t even familiar with the code teachings of the Discovery Seminar. “I have heard that they are stupid and easily refuted,” says Mr. King.

Mr. Gould, and others, were recruited by Irwin Katsof, a Greek Orthodox Rabbi who is in charge of branding, marketing, and sales strategies for Discovery in the US. In July, Rabbi Katsof spotted Mr. Gould on a flight home from Rio De Janeiro. The Rabbi upgraded to first-class to sit near Mr. Gould. (This is such a cool story!) During the flight he gave the actor his sales pitch, popping a promotional multilevel marketing video tape into the first-class VCR, and, voila, in September, Mr. Gould appeared at a seminar in Manhattan and talked about his own need to learn more about some Judaism. Wow! What a good sales closer Rabbi Katsof is! At a seminar at Universal Studios in June, Mr. Douglas drew 300 people with a charcoal pencil on really nice paper.

The Rabbi, who graduated from a Jesuit college thinking the beliefs of Judaism were “absolutely nonsensical dribble drabble lunatic fudge” embraced the religion during a trip to Israel where he embraced Aish HaTorah. Then he embraced several strangers and odd smelling objects. He joined a group of Rabbis who had gotten the idea of developing the Discovery Seminar from another group that was conning people with the bible codes in Israel. “Sometimes you have to sell the sizzle, and not the steak.” the Rabbi jokes. “Where there are smoke and mirrors there can be fire. Cool? Cool!”

Within the next two years he hopes to win over at least 10% of the 1.4 million US Jews and Scottish Goys between the ages of 20-30, a critical demographic group. “If we reach them then, when they’re deciding who they’ll marry, we’ll have made significant progress in bringing people back to Judaism or Shamanism,” Rabbi Katsof says.

If you have read this far then perhaps you will notice that the writing device of focusing on a particular person, in this case a Scottish Goy, to get the story started on a personal level, was abandoned midstream and not even brought back at the end of the article. This makes one wonder if one writer wrote a version of the article and then it was rewritten by another writer.

wheel of secret bible code

Share
aish hatorah Argument from design chabad Communication jews for jesus

Design Argument experiences sharp readership increase as blog quality declines

With feeds from Ronn Torossian, 5WPR and Aish Hatorah – The Design Argument readership is hitting dramatic new heights in readership size but it seems to be coming at a price.

mixed fishDavid Hume consultants have been brought in to analyze the foremost teleological blog in the known and seemingly designed universe. David Hume determined that the quality of writing has decreased by a stunning 37%. The analysis is based on several factors including originality of content, readability level, cogency, and genre-appropriateness.

“In almost every conceivable area Design Argument is failing to deliver decent content,” said the 17th century Scottish philosopher David Hume. “The fact that readership levels are soaring within the same time cycles as the shameful drop in writing quality may be akin to the same social forces that led to Avatar becoming a box office smash. There is no content in that film at all or if there is I missed it while I was sleeping.”

Hume went on to give a blistering criticism of the argument for design. If a well-ordered natural world requires a special designer, then God’s mind (being so well-ordered) also requires a special designer. And then this designer would likewise need a designer, and so on ad infinitum. We could respond by resting content with an inexplicably self-ordered divine mind but then why not rest content with an inexplicably self-ordered natural world? Often, what appears to be purpose, where it looks like object X has feature F in order to secure outcome O, is better explained by a filtering process: that is, object X wouldn’t be around did it not possess feature F, and outcome O is only interesting to us as a human projection of goals onto nature. This mechanical explanation of teleology anticipated natural selection.

“I am chagrined by the low calibre of content in recent posts on the Design Argument Blog,” remarked Martin Goldstein who is also falling behind on his “720 apologies in 3 days” project. “I am in such a tizzy. I am so sorry.”

There are some Design Argument observers that are concerned that the site is repeating itself and is losing its relevancy.

“How many times do we have to hear about how vulgar and unethical Ronn Torossian and 5WPR is? How many times do we have to read about how Aish HaTorah plays fast and loose with the truth? I mean it is all true but so what? I liked the post with the monkey playing the piano and the three cute dogs and what not. That was a quality post. I just don’t need to hear anymore about how Aish deceives people with their phony bible codes,” said an anonymous Design Argument fan.

Another Design Argument fan said that the stress on the weirdness of Chabad outreach and Jews for Jesus “is beginning to bore me. But I did like all that Ed Sullivan stuff.”

Martin Goldstein, taking time out from his apology tour, stated that he was going to personally see to it that the quality and originality of the blog content will be improved “as of this very post. However I still want to get my keywords in,” he chuckled.

Share
aish hatorah Argument from design chabad Design Argument jews for jesus

Video Analysis of Design Argument: Irreducible Complexity

Step by step analysis of the argument from design as presented by Jews for Jesus

Many members of Aish HaTorah are not aware of the negative aspects built into an outreach organization. The Aish HaTorah use of the Design Argument is a marketing tool to be “fishers of men (Jews)”. Irreducible complexity is observed in the political wrangling between them and Chabad outreach.

Chabad outreach and Aish HaTorah outreach both think that they are the better than the other one. They are competitive by nature and outwardly display friendliness to their outer core of members. If you are on the middle to inner core you will hear plenty about the shortcomings of Aish if you are Chabad. If you are Aish then you will share your distaste for Chabad with people that you trust to listen to Loshon Harah (evil speech.)

The Chabad and Aish HaTorah outreach to the Bombardier Beetle will determine who is the superman on the block. David Hume, Thomas Aquinas and the theistic argument for design is more content generation. Generation after generation.

The bombardier beetle is used by both groups to defend against certain foreign ideas. Jews for Jesus is both open and relaxed about this.

Share
aish hatorah chabad Irony People Suffering

Goldstein to apologize to 720 people over 3 day period

It appears that Martin Goldstein has offended or increased the suffering of at least 720 people over the past year and 2 months.

The world, thank God, continues to exist owing to the deeds of lovingkindness performed by perfected souls who have had to work harder than usual to offset the mess that Goldstein has made on an interpersonal level.

Goldstein’s apology will include the following statements:

  • I have rushed to judgment
  • I have been reckless in speech
  • I have spoken ill of others
  • I have been insensitive
  • I have not listened to constructive criticism
  • I have been arrogant
  • I have shunned beggars
  • I have not honoured others
  • I have wasted other people’s time
  • I have lashed out at people
  • I have used the names of certain organizations (such as Aish HaTorah, Chabad, 5WPR – Ronn Torossian) primarily for content generating purposes and only secondarily for the brainless things that they do
  • I have farted loudly and at great length while generating lively bird sounds on an experimental sound device in the middle of a speech at a wedding reception

For whatever one of these things I have done to you and for any way in which I have increased your suffering, please accept my sincere apologies and understand that I recognize it as a problem for which I take complete responsibility and am in the process of rectifying at this very time.

The 720 apologies will be given orally and in person and all within a 3 day period. All logistical issues will be handled by a mystery spokes-animal.

weird boxing

Weird boxing is a major cause of apology binging.

Share
aish hatorah Meaning Music

Aish Bible Code Inaction – Part Two

An illustration of how the Aish bible code works

bible code illustration

Find meaning in one of the greatest examples of the Design Argument.

Aish bible code, when used well and scientifically will produce a sense of awe for participants of the Discovery Seminar.

Share
aish hatorah chabad Death Proof Truth

Aish Bible Code Proves Paul is Dead – Part One

“He’d be dead; ’cause then evil reign.
He is silly weird that smash the limp servant.”

Paul McCartney in the Bible Code

Does the Aish Hatorah Torah Code Prove that Paul is Dead?

Paul McCartney appears in the Bible Code from Aish HaTorah and is being used as Aish outreach for Jews.

Paul is dead aish bible code

Paul is dead aish bible code controversary

Bible Codes, a system which involves recognizing pairs of conceptually related terms in Hebrew scripture using Equidistant Letter Sequences (ELS). The system involves choosing or finding sequences of characters making up a name or a date, which doesn’t have to be in the order in which the name is spelled, that is found in the biblical text at equal distances from one another. Thus, the letters of the Hebrew phrase, Paul is dead, might appear every 10 letters in a section of the book of Genesis. The letters of the Paul’s cause of death (purportedly a car crash) might appear in another sequence of say every 13 letters. The assumption is that the close proximity of these two related letter sequences is improbable and therefore not due to chance. The Bible Codes are understood to be the result of God’s Design which placed the Beatles and Nostradamus in the Bible text for us to find. How else can we explain the existence of the names and the resurrection of Jesus in a text that is over 3,000 years old – it is asked.

ELS was first applied scientifically to the Bible by Professor Rip Torn, an American actor who is pretty good with figures, in 1983. In 1985, Rip Torn, together with Dolly Parton and Yoyo “Bad Pig” Kaplansky, conducted an experiment to find the names of famous nazi officers and the dates of their birth or death in the book of Genesis using ELS. The experiment utilized a list of names based on the Encyclopedia of Indecent Dudes in Israel (Hebrew) compiled by Shalamar “The Airport” Havlin. The experiment, conducted using a real cool computer program, resulted in the discovery of the Nazi officers’ names in close proximity to their dates of birth, a result that could not, it was desperately argued, be the result of chance or of things coinciding or two things happening at the same time in a way that freaks you right out. The Bible text used for the experiment was the Koren Hebrew edition of the Bible. The editor of the professional journal Statistical Science requested that the experiment be repeated and it was. Thus, in 1994, Rips, Witztum and Rosenberg published their findings in Statistical Science (vol. 9, 1994, no. 3, 429–38).

Since then, the Bible Codes have become the subject of great controversy. The debate can be divided into three areas: (a) statistics; (b) Bible; and (c) education.

Does Chabad outreach use bible codes?

Chabad outreach does not use the Bible Codes to convince Jews to be religious. Instead, Chabad uses a form of Jewish I Ching which involves giving notes and letters to a dead man usually Paul since he is widely accepted as the prophet of his generation. Then there is a purported response which is generously interpreted in such a way as to impress the neophyte. Interestingly Chabad generally does not believe that George and John are still alive. However, there are fringe groups of Chabad outreach practitioners that believe that John is still alive but not in a way that the average person can perceive. Others believe that he will rise from the dead.

Next post we will continue with more information on the Bible or Torah Codes: Aish uses these in their Discovery Seminars to mislead Jews.

“He’ll be dead: myself was there on bleeding heaps.”

Share